Topic summary
⁠85%1 analyzed article/video876 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Online Censorship results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 426 hits. Analysis detected 3,363 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,628 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (4,396 of 15,755 topics). This Online Censorship is worse (more manipulative) than 72.10% of the peer group.
Online Censorship
Topic details
Total words: 2,628
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

72% percentile
025507510072.1% percentile
4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.2%16.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 15.8%15.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.4%13.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 7.4%7.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 7.0%7.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.4%13.4%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 6.8%6.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 16.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 7.0%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 2.0%False Dilemma: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.5%Begging the Question: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%Tu Quoque: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.2%Straw Man: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Indoctrination: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos