Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Oneplus results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 542 hits. Analysis detected 5,690 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,711 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,099 topics). This Oneplus is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Oneplus
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,711
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.6%7.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.4%6.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.1%8.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.1%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos