Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos215 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oil Reserves results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 334 hits. Analysis detected 2,683 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,622 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (4,630 of 16,269 topics). This Oil Reserves is worse (more manipulative) than 71.50% of the peer group.
Oil Reserves
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,622
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

72% percentile
025507510071.5% percentile
4.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.7%12.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.5%7.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.7%8.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 8.7%8.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.3%5.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 4.9%4.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.9%7.9%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.3%False Dilemma: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos