Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,599 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oil Industry Impact results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Availability Heuristic, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.7% saturation with 1,323 hits. Analysis detected 7,318 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,396 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (7,601 of 16,562 topics). This Oil Industry Impact is worse (more manipulative) than 54.10% of the peer group.
Oil Industry Impact
Topic details
Total words: 6,396
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

54% percentile
025507510054.1% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 20.7%20.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.1%8.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.0%2.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.6%3.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 20.7%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos