Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video2,759 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oil Exploration results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 1,369 hits. Analysis detected 9,515 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,036 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (12,428 of 16,562 topics). This Oil Exploration is better (less manipulative) than 75.00% of the peer group.
Oil Exploration
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 11,036
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

25% percentile
025507510025.0% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles11K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.8%8.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.1%0.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.0%4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 6.8%6.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.4%12.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.8%, sitewide 3.3%Halo Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos