Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video437 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oil Cartel results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.8% saturation with 293 hits. Analysis detected 1,745 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,748 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (3,366 of 16,562 topics). This Oil Cartel is worse (more manipulative) than 79.70% of the peer group.
Oil Cartel
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,748
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

80% percentile
025507510079.7% percentile
5.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.5%16.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.2%2.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 7.9%7.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.8%4.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 6.6%6.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 16.8%16.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.6%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.1%Begging the Question: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos