Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,516 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oil And Gas Emissions results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Authority, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 729 hits. Analysis detected 5,990 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,548 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (7,221 of 16,562 topics). This Oil And Gas Emissions is worse (more manipulative) than 56.40% of the peer group.
Oil And Gas Emissions
Topic details
Total words: 4,548
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510056.4% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.6%7.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 12.6%12.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.5%7.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 11.7%11.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 16.0%16.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.5%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos