Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos592 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ohio State Buckeyes results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, In-Group Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 33.8% saturation with 943 hits. Analysis detected 5,236 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,792 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (3,755 of 16,559 topics). This Ohio State Buckeyes is worse (more manipulative) than 77.30% of the peer group.
Ohio State Buckeyes
Topic details
Total words: 2,792
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

77% percentile
025507510077.3% percentile
5.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 33.8%33.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.8%8.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 14.6%14.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 9.8%9.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 14.5%14.5%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 8.9%8.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.3%5.3%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 33.8%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 9.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 2.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 3.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.0%Straw Man: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.9%Anecdotal: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos