Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,450 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ogden results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Anecdotal, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 634 hits. Analysis detected 4,771 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,197 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (10,727 of 16,562 topics). This Ogden is better (less manipulative) than 64.80% of the peer group.
Ogden
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,197
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

35% percentile
025507510035.2% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.2%12.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 11.8%11.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.2%2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos