Topic summary
⁠99%1 analyzed article/video630 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Office Market Trends results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Anecdotal, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 24.3% saturation with 459 hits. Analysis detected 3,388 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,890 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (3,017 of 16,562 topics). This Office Market Trends is worse (more manipulative) than 81.80% of the peer group.
Office Market Trends
Topic details
Total words: 1,890
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

82% percentile
025507510081.8% percentile
6.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.0%7.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 24.3%24.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 11.4%11.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 13.1%13.1%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 12.4%12.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 12.4%12.4%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Topic 5.2%5.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 24.3%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 13.1%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 0.5%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Composition/Division: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 0.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos