Topic summary
⁠60%1 analyzed article/video1,584 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ocean Warming results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 513 hits. Analysis detected 3,124 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,752 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (12,016 of 15,988 topics). This Ocean Warming is better (less manipulative) than 75.20% of the peer group.
Ocean Warming
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,752
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

25% percentile
025507510024.8% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.6%6.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.9%6.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.8%0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 1.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos