Topic summary
⁠94%1 analyzed article/video326 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ocean Safety results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Anecdotal, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 30.2% saturation with 394 hits. Analysis detected 2,636 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,304 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7% and a BS Rank of ⁠86% (2,377 of 16,562 topics). This Ocean Safety is worse (more manipulative) than 85.70% of the peer group.
Ocean Safety
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,304
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

86% percentile
025507510085.7% percentile
7.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 30.2%30.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 25.1%25.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 16.5%16.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 28.8%28.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 11.5%11.5%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 6.0%6.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 30.2%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 28.8%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 25.1%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%Straw Man: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 0.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Personal Incredulity: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.1%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos