Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,767 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ocean Beach results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 244 hits. Analysis detected 2,425 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,534 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (11,416 of 16,562 topics). This Ocean Beach is better (less manipulative) than 68.90% of the peer group.
Ocean Beach
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,534
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

31% percentile
025507510031.1% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.9%6.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos