Topic summary
⁠67%1 analyzed article/video567 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Obstetrics results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 236 hits. Analysis detected 1,596 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,268 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (7,152 of 21,765 topics). This Obstetrics is worse (more manipulative) than 67.10% of the peer group.
Obstetrics
Topic details
Total words: 2,268
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

67% percentile
025507510067.1% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.4%10.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.3%7.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.9%7.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.6%5.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.5%4.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.9%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.0%Recency Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos