Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,448 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Obfuscated Code results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 620 hits. Analysis detected 3,311 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,792 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (12,088 of 16,562 topics). This Obfuscated Code is better (less manipulative) than 73.00% of the peer group.
Obfuscated Code
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,792
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

27% percentile
025507510027.0% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.7%10.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.1%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos