Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 720 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Obama Family results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 30.6% saturation with 440 hits . Analysis detected 1,751 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,440 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.6% and a BS Rank of 88% (2,067 of 16,562 topics). This Obama Family is worse (more manipulative) than 87.50% of the peer group. Obama Family
Topic details
Total words: 1,440
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
88% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 87.5% percentile 7.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 25.9% 25.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 19.4% 19.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 30.6% 30.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 12.4% 12.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Topic 30.6%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 26.9% Confirmation Bias: Topic 25.9%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 19.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Ad Hominem: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Horn Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.0% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.0% Red Herring: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst