Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Obama results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, In-Group Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16.8% saturation with 350 hits. Analysis detected 2,675 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,088 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,406 topics). This Obama is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Obama
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,088
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.0%9.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.2%6.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 12.0%12.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 8.1%8.1%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.0%4.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.2%3.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 16.8%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 0.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos