Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 497 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nyc Infrastructure results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 421 hits . Analysis detected 1,965 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,982 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 54% (7,748 of 16,636 topics). This Nyc Infrastructure is worse (more manipulative) than 53.40% of the peer group. Nyc Infrastructure
Topic details
Total words: 2,982
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.4% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 14.1% 14.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.9% 8.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.5% Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.3% Primacy Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst