Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video497 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nyc Infrastructure results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 421 hits. Analysis detected 1,965 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,982 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 54% (7,748 of 16,636 topics). This Nyc Infrastructure is worse (more manipulative) than 53.40% of the peer group.
Nyc Infrastructure
Topic details
Total words: 2,982
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

53% percentile
025507510053.4% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.1%14.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.2%8.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.9%8.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.9%1.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.3%1.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.1%3.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.3%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos