Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,023 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nyc Hospitals results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Recency Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 632 hits. Analysis detected 2,617 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,092 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (8,953 of 16,562 topics). This Nyc Hospitals is better (less manipulative) than 54.10% of the peer group.
Nyc Hospitals
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,092
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510045.9% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.4%15.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.9%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos