Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video963 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nutrient Pollution results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Optimism Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 419 hits. Analysis detected 3,126 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,852 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (7,728 of 15,447 topics). This Nutrient Pollution is worse (more manipulative) than 50.00% of the peer group.
Nutrient Pollution
Topic details
Total words: 3,852
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

50% percentile
025507510050.0% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.4%4.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Topic 5.0%5.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Nature: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.2%Red Herring: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos