Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video110 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nuclear Waste results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 31 hits. Analysis detected 91 faulty-reasoning hits from 330 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠86% (2,404 of 16,562 topics). This Nuclear Waste is worse (more manipulative) than 85.50% of the peer group.
Nuclear Waste
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 330
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

86% percentile
025507510085.5% percentile
6.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles330 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.3%7.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.5%5.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 9.4%9.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos