Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos4,449 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nuclear Talks results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 831 hits. Analysis detected 7,849 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,147 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠8% (14,290 of 15,445 topics). This Nuclear Talks is better (less manipulative) than 92.50% of the peer group.
Nuclear Talks
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 14,147
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

8% percentile
02550751007.5% percentile
1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles14.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.9%5.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos