Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video960 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nuclear Programme results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.9% saturation with 764 hits. Analysis detected 4,418 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,840 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (6,368 of 16,562 topics). This Nuclear Programme is worse (more manipulative) than 61.60% of the peer group.
Nuclear Programme
Topic details
Total words: 3,840
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

62% percentile
025507510061.6% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.7%7.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 16.1%16.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 7.8%7.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.2%11.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 19.9%, sitewide 19.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.6%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos