Topic summary
⁠51%1 analyzed article/video654 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nuclear Monitoring results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Confirmation Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 341 hits. Analysis detected 2,178 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,616 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (8,589 of 16,562 topics). This Nuclear Monitoring is better (less manipulative) than 51.90% of the peer group.
Nuclear Monitoring
Topic details
Total words: 2,616
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

48% percentile
025507510048.1% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.3%6.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.1%7.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 13.0%13.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 6.5%6.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.4%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos