Topic summary
⁠23%1 analyzed article/video1,580 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nuclear Deterrence results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Optimism Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 403 hits. Analysis detected 3,982 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,320 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠16% (14,054 of 16,562 topics). This Nuclear Deterrence is better (less manipulative) than 84.90% of the peer group.
Nuclear Deterrence
Topic details
Total words: 6,320
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

15% percentile
025507510015.1% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.4%6.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos