Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video514 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nuclear Contamination results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 241 hits. Analysis detected 1,306 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,056 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (9,867 of 16,562 topics). This Nuclear Contamination is better (less manipulative) than 59.60% of the peer group.
Nuclear Contamination
Topic details
Total words: 2,056
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

40% percentile
025507510040.4% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.6%5.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.3%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.1%Middle Ground: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.1%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos