Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video111 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Npt Review Conference results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Unattributed Quote, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 33.6% saturation with 149 hits. Analysis detected 327 faulty-reasoning hits from 444 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠95% (821 of 16,562 topics). This Npt Review Conference is worse (more manipulative) than 95.00% of the peer group.
Npt Review Conference
Topic details
Total words: 444
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

95% percentile
025507510095.0% percentile
12.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles444 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.0%11.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 33.6%33.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 11.0%11.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 10.8%10.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 33.6%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 26.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 1.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos