Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Nova Corps results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Optimism Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 22.8% saturation with 294 hits. Analysis detected 1,784 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,287 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Nova Corps is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Nova Corps
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,287
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 22.8%22.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 18.1%18.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 15.8%15.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 14.2%14.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.4%10.4%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 22.8%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Topic 18.1%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Red Herring: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Composition/Division: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos