Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,494 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Norway results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 1,041 hits. Analysis detected 5,597 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,976 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (10,068 of 16,243 topics). This Norway is better (less manipulative) than 62.00% of the peer group.
Norway
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,976
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

38% percentile
025507510038.0% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 15.7%15.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.9%5.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 5.6%5.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.7%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos