Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These North Korean Leadership results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 22.1% saturation with 1,201 hits. Analysis detected 7,363 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,424 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This North Korean Leadership is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
North Korean Leadership
Topic details
Total words: 5,424
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 22.1%22.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.1%8.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.8%12.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.2%2.2%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 26.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 22.1%, sitewide 1.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.1%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 4.6%Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos