Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video4,077 analyzed words
BS Summary: These North Bay results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Hasty Generalization, with Hindsight Bias as the most egregious example at 5% saturation with 812 hits. Analysis detected 8,481 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,308 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠4% (16,044 of 16,562 topics). This North Bay is better (less manipulative) than 96.90% of the peer group.
North Bay
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 16,308
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

3% percentile
02550751003.1% percentile
1.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles16.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.7%4.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos