Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,653 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Normalization Of White Supremacist Views results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 32.7% saturation with 1,620 hits. Analysis detected 10,549 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,959 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠84% (2,700 of 16,562 topics). This Normalization Of White Supremacist Views is worse (more manipulative) than 83.70% of the peer group.
Normalization Of White Supremacist Views
Topic details
Total words: 4,959
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

84% percentile
025507510083.7% percentile
6.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 32.7%32.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 12.5%12.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 18.5%18.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 27.3%27.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 19.5%19.5%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 9.6%9.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Topic 6.2%6.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Confirmation Bias: Topic 32.7%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Topic 27.3%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 19.5%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 18.5%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 17.7%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 3.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 6.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Special Pleading: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.3%Composition/Division: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.2%Straw Man: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos