Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video4,480 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nomadic Living results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 2,120 hits. Analysis detected 12,483 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,920 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠14% (14,333 of 16,562 topics). This Nomadic Living is better (less manipulative) than 86.50% of the peer group.
Nomadic Living
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 17,920
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

14% percentile
025507510013.5% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles17.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.3%8.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 11.8%11.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos