Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video398 analyzed words
BS Summary: These No Kings Protest results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 25.4% saturation with 810 hits. Analysis detected 5,154 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,184 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠84% (2,681 of 16,562 topics). This No Kings Protest is worse (more manipulative) than 83.80% of the peer group.
No Kings Protest
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,184
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

84% percentile
025507510083.8% percentile
6.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 22.4%22.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 18.9%18.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 25.4%25.4%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 8.0%8.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.6%5.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.3%11.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.0%6.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 25.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 25.4%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 22.4%, sitewide 2.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 18.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Personal Incredulity: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.2%Bandwagon: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Red Herring: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos