Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video45 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nlcs results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Bandwagon, and Loss Aversion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 75.6% saturation with 102 hits. Analysis detected 569 faulty-reasoning hits from 135 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 38.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠100% (36 of 16,562 topics). This Nlcs is worse (more manipulative) than 99.80% of the peer group.
Nlcs
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 135
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

100% percentile
025507510099.8% percentile
38.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles135 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 75.6%75.6%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 46.7%46.7%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 46.7%46.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 60.0%60.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 37.8%37.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 37.8%37.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 37.8%37.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 31.1%31.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 28.9%28.9%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 15.6%15.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Framing Effect: Topic 75.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 60.0%, sitewide 15.9%Bandwagon: Topic 46.7%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 46.7%, sitewide 2.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 37.8%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 37.8%, sitewide 6.9%Recency Bias: Topic 37.8%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 31.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 28.9%, sitewide 4.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 2.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos