Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video553 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nil Reform results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 44.7% saturation with 742 hits. Analysis detected 4,867 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,659 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠94% (1,070 of 15,781 topics). This Nil Reform is worse (more manipulative) than 93.20% of the peer group.
Nil Reform
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,659
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

93% percentile
025507510093.2% percentile
10.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 39.6%39.6%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 29.2%29.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 44.7%44.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 19.6%19.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 19.4%19.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 19.5%19.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 10.6%10.6%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Topic 8.2%8.2%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 8.1%8.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 13.1%13.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 44.7%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 39.6%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 29.2%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 19.6%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 19.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 19.4%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 15.7%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 6.0%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 2.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Horn Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos