Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video745 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nfl Teams results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 52.2% saturation with 1,165 hits. Analysis detected 4,176 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,231 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (2,819 of 16,562 topics). This Nfl Teams is worse (more manipulative) than 83.00% of the peer group.
Nfl Teams
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,231
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

83% percentile
025507510083.0% percentile
6.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 52.2%52.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 22.0%22.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.5%9.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 8.4%8.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 12.4%12.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 24.0%24.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.0%3.0%No True ScotsmanSitewide 0.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 52.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 24.0%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 22.0%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Bandwagon: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 4.0%No True Scotsman: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.1%Begging the Question: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Red Herring: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.7%Straw Man: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos