Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,319 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nfl Schedule Prediction results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.3% saturation with 1,071 hits. Analysis detected 7,113 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,276 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (4,823 of 15,327 topics). This Nfl Schedule Prediction is worse (more manipulative) than 68.50% of the peer group.
Nfl Schedule Prediction
Topic details
Total words: 5,276
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

69% percentile
025507510068.5% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 20.3%20.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 16.4%16.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 9.7%9.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 20.3%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 19.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos