Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video722 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nfl Schedule Changes results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 25.6% saturation with 740 hits. Analysis detected 3,974 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,888 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (5,151 of 16,562 topics). This Nfl Schedule Changes is worse (more manipulative) than 68.90% of the peer group.
Nfl Schedule Changes
Topic details
Total words: 2,888
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

69% percentile
025507510068.9% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 25.6%25.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.9%6.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.1%5.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 14.8%14.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 11.5%11.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 10.3%10.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 25.6%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Circular Reasoning: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos