Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 443 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nfl Discipline results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Overconfidence Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 43.8% saturation with 582 hits . Analysis detected 3,102 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,329 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.1% and a BS Rank of 93% (1,255 of 16,562 topics). This Nfl Discipline is worse (more manipulative) than 92.40% of the peer group. Nfl Discipline
Topic details
Total words: 1,329
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
92% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 92.4% percentile 10.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 43.8% 43.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 12.9% 12.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 29.5% 29.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 13.4% 13.4% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Topic 8.3% 8.3% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Topic 10.2% 10.2% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Topic 8.6% 8.6% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 11.9% 11.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 12.9% 12.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 43.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 29.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 20.3%, sitewide 15.9% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 4.6% Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 2.2% Halo Effect: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 7.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 2.7% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Recency Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 1.7% Red Herring: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 0.7% Anecdotal: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.9% Bandwagon: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 2.2% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.5% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.6% Horn Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.0% Personal Incredulity: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.2% Burden of Proof: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst