Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video742 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New York State Troopers results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 39.7% saturation with 882 hits. Analysis detected 4,689 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,221 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠86% (2,465 of 16,562 topics). This New York State Troopers is worse (more manipulative) than 85.10% of the peer group.
New York State Troopers
Topic details
Total words: 2,221
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

85% percentile
025507510085.1% percentile
6.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 39.7%39.7%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 11.9%11.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 25.7%25.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 9.8%9.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 11.8%11.8%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 6.7%6.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 14.9%14.9%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Topic 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 39.7%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Topic 24.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 25.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 11.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 1.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Special Pleading: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.6%Red Herring: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos