Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These New York State Politics results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 54.2% saturation with 710 hits. Analysis detected 3,404 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,311 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This New York State Politics is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
New York State Politics
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
⁠0%New York State Politics (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 1,311
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 54.2%54.2%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 25.1%25.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.1%11.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 19.6%19.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 28.9%28.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 17.7%17.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 12.2%12.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 8.8%8.8%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 7.0%7.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 54.2%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 28.9%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 25.1%, sitewide 1.4%Confirmation Bias: Topic 19.6%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 17.7%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.5%Straw Man: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos