Topic summary
ā 0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These New York State Politics results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Politically Right Leaning Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 54.2% saturation with 710 hits . Analysis detected 3,404 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,311 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ā 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This New York State Politics is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. New York State Politics
Topic details
Total words: 1,311
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0ā75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 54.2% 54.2% Politically Right Leaning⦠Sitewide 1.4% Topic 25.1% 25.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.1% 11.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 19.6% 19.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 28.9% 28.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 17.7% 17.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.5% 7.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 12.2% 12.2% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Fundamental Attribution E⦠Sitewide 2.7% Topic 7.0% 7.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 54.2%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Topic 28.9%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 26.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 25.1%, sitewide 1.4% Confirmation Bias: Topic 19.6%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Topic 17.7%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 9.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 2.7% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Slippery Slope: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.5% Straw Man: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst