Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video356 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New York City Weather results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Availability Heuristic, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 33.1% saturation with 354 hits. Analysis detected 2,366 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,068 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠95% (805 of 15,399 topics). This New York City Weather is worse (more manipulative) than 94.80% of the peer group.
New York City Weather
Topic details
Total words: 1,068
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

95% percentile
025507510094.8% percentile
12.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 30.1%30.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 27.6%27.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 21.6%21.6%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 13.0%13.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 26.3%26.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 33.1%33.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 20.4%20.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 9.8%9.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.0%9.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 33.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 30.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 27.6%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 26.3%, sitewide 19.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 21.6%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 20.4%, sitewide 15.9%Recency Bias: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos