Topic summary
⁠98%1 analyzed article/video390 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New York City Mayor results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 39.3% saturation with 460 hits. Analysis detected 2,896 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,170 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (1,506 of 16,562 topics). This New York City Mayor is worse (more manipulative) than 90.90% of the peer group.
New York City Mayor
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠91%New York City Mayor (selected)10%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 1,170
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

91% percentile
025507510090.9% percentile
9.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 39.3%39.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 18.2%18.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 22.2%22.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 22.7%22.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 29.1%29.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 15.1%15.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 8.8%8.8%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 11.6%11.6%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 9.1%9.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Ad Hominem: Topic 39.3%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity Bias: Topic 29.1%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 22.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 22.2%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 19.6%, sitewide 15.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 18.2%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 5.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 3.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 9.1%Horn Effect: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.9%Straw Man: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 0.9%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Burden of Proof: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.4%Tu Quoque: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Ad HominemSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos