Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These New Orleans Economy results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 378 hits. Analysis detected 2,823 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,120 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This New Orleans Economy is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
New Orleans Economy
Topic details
Total words: 3,120
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.9%3.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.1%12.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 8.6%8.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.9%6.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%False Dilemma: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 1.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Nature: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.2%Recency Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%No True Scotsman: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.1%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos