Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 546 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New Mexico Lobos results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias , Halo Effect , and Optimism Bias , with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 37.5% saturation with 614 hits . Analysis detected 4,352 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,638 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.8% and a BS Rank of 92% (1,335 of 16,562 topics). This New Mexico Lobos is worse (more manipulative) than 91.90% of the peer group. New Mexico Lobos
Topic details
Total words: 1,638
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
92% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 91.9% percentile 9.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 37.5% 37.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 25.2% 25.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 24.5% 24.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 23.6% 23.6% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 18.6% 18.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 19.1% 19.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 17.3% 17.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.6% 10.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 12.9% 12.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% In-Group Bias: Topic 37.5%, sitewide 6.9% Framing Effect: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 26.9% Anchoring Bias: Topic 25.2%, sitewide 4.0% Halo Effect: Topic 24.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 23.6%, sitewide 6.0% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 19.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 19.1%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 8.1% False Dilemma: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.7% Circular Reasoning: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst