Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,086 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New Jersey Elections results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 588 hits. Analysis detected 5,661 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,344 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (6,320 of 16,562 topics). This New Jersey Elections is worse (more manipulative) than 61.80% of the peer group.
New Jersey Elections
Topic details
Total words: 4,344
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

62% percentile
025507510061.8% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.5%13.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 11.4%11.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.0%7.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.6%12.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 6.7%6.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.8%12.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.7%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Tu Quoque: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.2%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos