Topic summary
⁠20%1 analyzed article/video548 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New Hire results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 318 hits. Analysis detected 1,198 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,192 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (3,865 of 20,801 topics). This New Hire is worse (more manipulative) than 81.40% of the peer group.
New Hire
Topic details
Total words: 2,192
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

81% percentile
025507510081.4% percentile
5.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 14.5%14.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 12.6%12.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 8.2%8.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 7.0%7.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos