Topic summary
⁠53%1 analyzed article/video467 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New Film Initiatives results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Availability Heuristic, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 22.1% saturation with 412 hits. Analysis detected 2,199 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,868 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (4,789 of 16,562 topics). This New Film Initiatives is worse (more manipulative) than 71.10% of the peer group.
New Film Initiatives
Topic details
Total words: 1,868
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

71% percentile
025507510071.1% percentile
4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 22.1%22.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.9%11.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.2%3.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.1%12.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.2%3.2%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 22.1%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.5%Composition/Division: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos