Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,918 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New England Patriots results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Halo Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 941 hits. Analysis detected 4,867 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,066 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (10,029 of 16,562 topics). This New England Patriots is better (less manipulative) than 60.60% of the peer group.
New England Patriots
Topic details
Total words: 6,066
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

39% percentile
025507510039.4% percentile
2.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.7%6.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 15.5%15.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.4%9.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos